macy's and jc penney going head to head in a courtroom in lower manhattan. courtney is live there with the details. courtney? >> scott, this is largely a contractual dispute. high level players involved make this case very intriguing and at times even personal. now lundgren told the court when martha stewart entered into the deal, she was just coming out of jail, wanted to have a higher quality product. macy's wanted an exclusive long-term contract with the ability to renew. because of the fact that this takes a very long time to build a business and market a line like this. lundgren continued to explain that martha stewart's company came back and said at some point if she wanted to build a free-standing store, would she be able to do so? lundgren said yes, the context would be a free-standing store full-priced line product to elevate the brand. much like tommy hilfiger does, inside macy's and separately on mad son avenue. lundgren talked about importance of the product line, saying she is the largest vender in home and they built the line from scratch to a